Flooding and extreme weather
When routes and facilities are disrupted, students lose access to learning resources and institutional services. Connectivity plans need fallbacks and clear recovery steps.
i4E nonprofit
Climate Resilience
How i4E uses practical technology to strengthen climate resilience and keep learning accessible for vulnerable communities in Bangladesh.
Climate resilience
Technology that helps learning continue through climate disruption.
Communities living in poverty often experience the worst impacts of climate change—flooding, heat, power instability, and connectivity disruption—despite contributing the least to the crisis. i4E builds practical, education-first connectivity and digital learning systems that support safer access, continuity, and local capability.
This page summarizes i4E’s climate-related work and how technology investment can strengthen resilience for vulnerable learners and institutions in Bangladesh.
What disruption looks like for education.
Power instability
Outages can take down networks, learning systems, and communication channels. Resilience requires power planning, local caching, and operational playbooks.
Displacement and interrupted schooling
Climate-related displacement can interrupt education access, records, and learner support. Resilience includes continuity options and safer communication channels for affected families.
Reference: UNESCO on the right to education, climate change, and displacement — read more.
What we do
Resilient connectivity for learning.
i4E’s approach connects infrastructure with real educational workflows. We focus on dependable campus networks, safer access, practical learning tools, and training so institutions can keep systems running locally.
- Campus WiFi and network foundations for schools and colleges.
- Safer access practices (e.g., DNS/network controls appropriate for education settings).
- Digital learning continuity through usable platforms, local documentation, and support.
- Capacity transfer so local teams can maintain and respond during disruption.
Public field notes and climate-linked work.
Climate-resilient campus connectivity
A practical framework for keeping essential campus connectivity and local learning resources available through power and backhaul disruption.
Climate literacy and green digital learning
Combining efficient digital infrastructure, resilient learning access, and responsible climate education.
More work examples: see all case studies and research & insights.
How we measure climate resilience outcomes.
Funders often ask for measurable evidence of climate resilience, technology adoption, and benefits for vulnerable communities. i4E tracks the program metrics below and shares the latest figures through a documented request (to protect privacy and keep institution-level details safe).
| Metric | Latest (aggregated) | What it measures | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Institutions supported | 120+ schools/colleges | Institutions receiving connectivity, safer access, or learning system support. | Shows breadth of deployment while keeping site-level details protected. |
| Learners reached | ~85,000 learners | Estimated learners benefiting from improved access via supported institutions. | Links infrastructure investment to people-level benefit. |
| Teachers/staff supported | 3,200 educators/staff | Educators and staff trained or enabled to maintain resilient learning access. | Reflects capability transfer and operational ownership. |
| Connectivity coverage points | 1,450 APs/switch nodes | Installed or improved network nodes used for learning spaces. | Demonstrates infrastructure scale and footprint. |
| Resilience playbooks delivered | 95 campuses | Sites receiving documented procedures for outage response, recovery, and continuity. | Indicates preparedness adoption beyond hardware deployment. |
| Outage recovery time (MTTR) | Avg. 3.8 hours | Average time to restore essential connectivity/services after disruption. | Direct resilience indicator: faster recovery means less learning disruption. |
| Uptime (essential services) | 99.2% availability | Availability for critical learning connectivity/services during the reporting period. | Shows reliability of “learning-critical” connectivity and systems. |
| Safer access deployments | 110 institutions | Sites using education-appropriate DNS/filtering/network controls. | Highlights child-safe and education-appropriate access. |
| Digital learning systems in use | 75 institutions | Institutions actively using LMS or related continuity tools supported by i4E. | Demonstrates learning continuity adoption, not just connectivity. |
| Training completion rate | 92% completion | % of participants completing core operational training for local ownership. | Signals sustainability: local teams can operate and maintain systems. |
Notes: Figures are aggregated and rounded for public reporting; supporting documentation can be shared with funders on request. Last updated: 22 August 2026.
External context indicators (global)
These figures describe the broader climate/displacement context. They are not i4E performance metrics.
| Indicator | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Projected internal climate migration (by 2050) | Up to 216 million people across six regions | World Bank — Groundswell Part II (PDF) |
| People living in internal displacement (end of 2023) | 75.9 million | IDMC — GRID 2024 |
Partner on climate resilience for education.
Tell us the community, the institution, and the climate-related constraint you want to address.